Previous Page  25 / 224 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 224 Next Page
Page Background

739

2007;28:212-30.

102. Preminger JE, Meeks S. Evaluation of an audiological

rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing

loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2010;21:315-28.

103. Sweetow R, Palmer CV. Efficacy of individual auditory

training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am

Acad Audiol 2005;16:494-504.

104. Hawkins D. Effectiveness of counselling-based adult group

aural rehabilitation programs: A systematic review of the

evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16(7):485-93. .

105. Chisolm T AM. Evidence about the effectiveness of aural

rehabilitation programs for adults. 2012.

106. Collins MP, Liu CF, Taylor L, Souza PE, Yueh B. Hearing aid

effectiveness after aural rehabilitation: individual versus

group trial results. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013;50:585-98.

107. Sabate. Adherence Meeting Report . In: Organization. WH,

ed. Genove.; 2001.

108. Bergman M. On the origins of Audiology: American wartime

military audiology. . Audiology Today 2002.

109. Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of

Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004;43:85-99.

110. Schow RL NM. Communication screening profile: use

with

elderly

clients.

<

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

pubmed/7095322%3E. Ear Hear 1982;3(3):135-47.

111. Alpiner JG CW, Glascoe G, Metz M, Olsen B. The Denver Scale

of Communicative Function. Denver; 1974.

112. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form

health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item

selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.

113. Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of

Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other

measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing

aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:27-43.

114. Noble W. Extending the IOI to significant others and

to non-hearing-aid-based interventions. Int J Audiol

2002;41:27-9.

115. Yueh B, McDowell JA, Collins M, Souza PE, Loovis CF, Deyo

RA. Development and validation of the effectiveness of

[corrected] auditory rehabilitation scale. Arch Otolaryngol

Head Neck Surg 2005;131:851-6.

116. Cardemil F, Esquivel P, Aguayo L, et al. Transcultural

adaptation to Spanish of the instrument “Effectiveness of

Auditory Rehabilitation” for the assessment of quality of

life in patients using hearing aids. Acta Otorrinolaringol

Esp2013;64:416-22.

117. Sanchez-Camon I, Lassaletta L, Castro A, Gavilan J. [Quality

of life of patients with BAHA]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp

2007;58:316-20.

118. Cox RM, Gilmore C. Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid

Performance (PHAP). J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:343-57.

119. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid

benefit. Ear Hear 1995;16:176-86.

120. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for

the elderly: a new tool. Ear Hear 1982;3:128-34.

121. Lichtenstein MJ, Hazuda HP. Cross-cultural adaptation of

the hearing handicap inventory for the Elderly-Screening

Version (HHIE-S) for use with Spanish-speaking Mexican

Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:492-8.

122. Cox RM SD, Kramer SE. Translations of the International

Out come Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). Int J Audiol

2002;41:3-26.

123. Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring Satisfaction with

Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear

1999;20:306-20.Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG.

Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological

surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

1996;105:415-22.

[HIPOACUSIA: TRASCENDENCIA, INCIDENCIA Y PREVALENCIA - Dra. Constanza Díaz y cols.]