52 / 224
766
9. Aazh H., Moore B. The Value of Routine Real Ear Measurement
of the Gain of Digital Hearing Aids J Am Acad Audiol 18:653–
664 (2007).
10. Tharpe A.M., Sladen D., Huta H., McKinley Rothpletz A. Practical
Considerations of Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference Measures in
Infants. American Journal of Audiology Vol. 10 41-49 June
2001Walker G, Byrne D.
11. Dillon H. The effects of multichannel compression/expansion
amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in
noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Sep;76(3):746-57.
12. Leeuw AR, Dreschler WA. Advantages of directional hearing
aid microphones related to room acoustics. Audiology.
1991;30(6):330-44.
13. Kuk F, Peeters H, Lau C, Korhonen P. Effect of maximum power
output and noise reduction on speech recognition in noise. J Am
Acad Audiol. 2011 May;22(5):265-73.
14. Kates JM Constrained adaptation for feedback cancellation in
hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug;106(2):1010-9.
15. Ching T., Johnson E., Hou S., Dillon H., Zhang V., Burns L.,
Van Buynder P., Wong A., Flynn C. A comparison of NAL and
DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting:
Predicted speech intelligibility and loudness. International
Journal of Audiology 2013; 52: S29–S38.
16. Meister H, Rählmann S, Walger M, Margolf-Hackl S, Kießling J.
Hearing aid fitting in older persons with hearing impairment:
the influence of cognitive function, age, and hearing loss on
hearing aid benefit. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Feb 10;10:435-43.
[REV. MED. CLIN. CONDES - 2016; 27(6) 761-766]