Previous Page  97 / 224 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 97 / 224 Next Page
Page Background

811

El autor declara no tener conflictos de interés, en relación a este artículo.

1.

Clark GM, Pyman BC, Bailey QR.The surgery for multiple electrde

cochlear implantations. J Laringol Otol 1979; 93:679-695.

2. Roland JT. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion

and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design

and insertion technique. Laryngoscope .2005;115:1325-39.

(PubMed:16094101).

3. Ching TY, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H et al, Should children who

use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear

Hear 2001;22:365-80.

4. GantzBJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.

Laryngoscope 2003; 113 :1726-30.

5. James C, Albergger K, Battmer R el al. Preservation of residual

hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why.Acta

Oto-Laryngologica, 2005; 125:481-491.

6. Hogan CA,Turner CW. Hiigh frecuency audibility benefits for

hearung-impaired listeners. Journal of Acustical Society of

America, vol. 104,no.1,pp.432-441,1998.

7. Esraghi AA, Yang NW, Balkany TJ. Comparative study of cochlear

damage with three perimodiolar designs. Laryngoscope 2003;

113:415-9.

8. Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner WD,et al.Hearing

preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic

stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:348-52.

9. Hodges AV, Schloffman J, Balkany T.Conservation of residual

hearing with cochlear implantation. The American Journal of

Otology, vol.18, no.2,pp.179-183,199.

10. Gantz BJ, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.

Laryngoscope, vol.113,no.pp.1726-17230,2003.

11. Gantz BJ, Hansen MR,Turner CW et al, Hybrid 10 clinicaltrial.

Audiology and Neurology, vol.14, supplement 1, pp.32-38,

2009.

12. Lenarz T., Stöver T., Buechner A et al. Hearing conservation surgery

using the hybrid L electrode: results from the first clinical trial at

the Medical University of Hannover. Audiology and Neurotology,

vol 14, no.1,pp.22-31,2009.

13. Jurawitz MC, Büchner A, Harpel T, Lenarz

T.et

al.Hearing

preservationoutcomeswithdifferentcochlearimplantelectrodes:

Nucleus® HybridTM-L24 and Nucleus FreedomTM CI422. Audiol

Neurootol. 2014;19(5):293-309. doi: 10.1159/000360601.

Epub 2014 Oct .

14. GstoettnerWK,vandeHeyningP,etal.Electricacousticstimulation

of the auditory system:results of multicentre investigation. Acta

Oto-Laryngologica,vol.128.no.9,pp. 968-975,2008.

15. Carlson ML, Driscoll CL, Gifford RH, et al. Implications of

minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):962-8.

16. Lehnhardt E.Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant

electrodes in soft surgery technique (PMID:8376183) Hals-

REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRáFICAS

Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.1993,

41(7):356-359.

17. Wright CG, Roland PS. Temporal bone microdisection for

anatomic study of cochlear implant electrodes. Cochlear

Implants International, vol.6,no. 4,pp. 159-168,2005.

18. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski MT,et al. Cochleostomy site impliations

for electrode placement and hearing preservatio. Acta

Oto-Laryngologica,vol.125, no 8,pp. 870-876,2005.

19. Havenith S., Lammers MJ.,Tange RA et al.Hearing preservation

surgery:cochleostomy or round window approach? A systematic

reviewOtology and Neurotology, vol.34,no 4,pp. 667-674,2013.

20. Friedland D, Runge C. Soft Cochlear Implantation: Rationale for

the surgical approach. Trends in Amplification, vol 14, no 2 ,pp.

124-138, 2009.

21. Oghalai JS, Tonini J., et al.Intra-operative monitoring of cochlear

function during cochlear implantation.Cochlear Implants

International, vol.10, no 1, pp.1-18,2009.

22. Helbig S.,Rajan GP.,et al.Hearingpreservation after cochlear

reimplantation. Otology and Neurotology, vol.34,no. 1, pp.

61-65,2013.

[Implante Coclear y audición residual - Dr. Leopoldo Cordero]