32 / 80
C.-E. Martín
López
et al.
/ Cir Cardiov. 2016;
23(1)
:11–17
17
Conflicto de
intereses
Los autores declaran no
tener ningún
conflicto de
intereses.
Bibliografía
1.
Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM,Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J
Med. 1986;314:1
–
6.2.
Dion R, GlineurD, Derouck D, Verhelst R,
Noirhomme P,
El Khoury G, et al.
Long- term clinical and angiographic follow-up of sequential internal thoracic artery grafting.
Eur J
Cardiothorac Surg.
2000;17:407
–
14.3.
CameronA , Davis KB, Green G,Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal- thoracic-artery grafts
–
effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:216– 9.4.
Gansera B, Schmidtler F, Angelis I,Kiask T,
Kemkes
BM, Botzenhardt F. Patency of internal thoracic artery compared to vein grafts-postoperative angiograp- hic findings in
1189 symptomatic patients in
12 years. Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 2007;55:412– 7.
5.
Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internalmammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg.
1985;89:248– 58.
6.
Barner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. Twelve-year experience with inter- nal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;90:668– 75.7.
Weiss AJ, ZhaoS, Tian DH, Taggart DP, Yan TD. A meta-analysis
comparing bila- teral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Cardiothorac
Surg.
2013;2:390
–
400.8.
Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD,Houghtaling PL, Arnold JH, Akhrass
R, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg. 1999;117:855
–
72.9.
TaggartDP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on sur- vival: A systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001;358:870 –5.
10.
Grau JB, Ferrari G, Mak AW, Shaw RE, Brizzio ME,Mindich
BP, et al. Propensity matched analysis of bilateral internal
mammary artery versus single left internal mammary artery grafting at 17-year follow-up: Validation of a contemporary surgical experience.
Eur J
Cardiothorac
Surg.
2012;41:770
–
5,discusión 776.
11.
Kurlansky PA, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, Galbut DL, Zucker M, Ebra G. Thirty- year follow-up defines survival benefit for second internal mammary artery in propensity-matched groups.Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:101 –8.
12.
Savage EB,Grab JD,
O’Brien SM, Ali A, Okum EJ, Perez-Tamayo RA, et al. Use of both internal thoracic arteries in diabetic
patients increases deep sternal
wound infection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1002 –6.
13.
Deo SV, Shah IK, Dunlay SM, Erwin PJ, Locker C, Altarabsheh SE, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery harvest and deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:862 –9.14.
Pevni D, Uretzky G,Mohr A, Braunstein R, Kramer A, Paz Y, et al. Routine use of bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting: Long-term results. Circulation. 2008;118:705 –12.
15.
Dai C, Lu Z, Zhu H, Xue S, Lian F. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting and risk of sternal wound infection: Evidence from observational studies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1938 –45.16.
Medalion B,Mohr R, Frid O, Uretzky G,
Nesher N, Paz Y, et al. Should bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting be
used in
elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass
grafting? Circulation.
2013;127:2186– 93.
17.
Pettinari M, Sergeant P, Meuris B. Bilateral internal thoracic artery graf- ting increases long-term survival in elderly patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47:703 –9.18.
Perings SM, Bosch R, Eggeling T, Hennersdorf M, Graf la Rosee K, Korte T, et al. European guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Herz. 2011;36: 265 –6.19.
Byrne JG, Leacche M. The American Heart Association/American College of Car- diology Foundation guideline for coronary artery bypass grafting: 2011updates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:35 –6.
20.
Bridgewater B, Kinsman R, Walton P, Gummert J, Kappetein AP. The 4th Euro- pean Association for CardioThoracic Surgery adult cardiac surgery database report. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:4– 5.21.
Itagaki S, Cavallaro P, Adams DH, Chikwe J. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafts,mortality and morbidity: An
analysis
of 1 526 360 coronary bypass
ope- rations.
Heart. 2013;99:849 –53.
22.
Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, Lees B, Nugara F, Yu LM, et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting:1-year results of the arterial revascularisation trial (ART). Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2470 –81.
23.
RoquesF, Michel
P, Goldstone AR,
Nashef SA. The logistic EuroSCORE.
Eur Heart J. 2000;24:881 –2.
24.
Puskas JD, Sadiq A, Vassiliades TA, Kilgo PD, Lattouf OM. Bilateral internal thora- cic artery grafting is associated with significantly improved long-term survival, even among diabetic patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:710 –6.25.
GlineurD, D’hoore
W, Price J,
Dorméus S, de Kerchove L, Dion
R, et al. Survival benefit of multiple arterial grafting in a 25-year single-institutional expe- rience: The importance of the third arterial graft. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:284 –90.
26.
Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: the forgot- ten conduit-5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92: 9–
17.27.
Payeli SK, Latini R, Gebhard C, Patrignani A, Wagner U, Lüscher TF, et al. Prot- hombotic gene expression profile in vascular smooth muscle cells of human saphenous vein, but not internal mammary artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:705 –10.28.
Sabik JF 3rd, Stockins A, Nowicki ER, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, Lytle BW, et al. Does location of the second internal thoracic artery graft influenceoutcome of coronary
artery bypass grafting? Circulation. 2008;118:S210
–
5.29.
Shahian DM,O’Brien SM, Normand SL, Peterson ED, Edwards FH. Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume with processes of care, mortality, morbidity and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
composite quality score. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg.
2010;139:273– 82.
30.
BoodhwaniM ,L am BK, Nathan HJ, MesanaT G, Ruel M,Z eng W,e ta l. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves ster- nalperfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomised,
double-blind, within-patient comparison.
Circulation. 2006;114:766 –73.
31.
Sá MP, Ferraz PE, Escobar RR, Vasconcelos FP, Ferraz AA, Braile DM, et al. Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: Meta-analysis and meta- regression of 4817 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013;16: 849 –57.