102 / 176
746
1. Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF. The
Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology. Eur
J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:592-7.
2. Miller’s Anesthesia, 8va edition. 2015. Volume 2 part v.
Chapter 90.2646-2673.
3. Ferrari LR. Anesthesia outside the operating room. Curr Opin
Anaesthesiol 2015; 28(4):439–40.
4. Continuum
of
depth
of
sedation:
definition of general anesthesia and levels of sedation/
analgesia. Committee of Origin: Quality Management and
Departmental Administration. (Approved by the ASA House of
Delegates on October 13, 1999, and last amended on October
15, 2014).
5. Dexter F, Wachtel RE. Scheduling for anesthesia at geographic
locations remote from the operating room. Curr Opin
Anaesthesiol 2014;27(4):426–30.
6. Bader AM, Pothier MM. Out-of-operating room procedures:
preprocedure assessment. Anesthesiol Clin 2009;27(1):121–6.
7. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD, McPeek B.
Preventable
anesthesia
mishaps:
a
study
of
human factors. 1978. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;
11: 277-82.
8. Robbertze R, Posner KL, Domino KB. Closed claims review of
anesthesiaforproceduresoutsidetheoperatingroom.CurrOpin
Anaesthesiol 2006Aug; 19(4): 436-42. 9. Jastak JT, PeskinRM.
Major morbidity or mortality from o ce anesthetic procedures:
a closed-claim analysis of 13 cases. Anesth Prog 1991;
38: 39-44.
9. ASA physical status classification system. Last approved by
the ASA House of Delegates on October 15, 2014.
10. Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper K, Shanks A et al. Incidence
and Predictors of Difficult and Impossible Mask Ventilation.
Anesthesiology 2006; 105:885-91.
11. Domino KB. Office-based anesthesia: lessons learned from the
closed claims project. ASA Newsletter 2001; 65:9 – 11; 15.
12. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, Cheney FW. Adverse respiratory
events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology
1990; 72:828–833.
13. Bhananker SM, Posner KL, Cheney FW, Caplan RA, Lee LA,
Domino
KB.
Injury
and
liability
associated
with
monitored
anesthesia
care:
a
closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 228-34.
14. ASA. Statement on nonoperating room anesthetizing
locations: committee of origin: standards and practice
parameters (approved by the ASA house of delegates on
October 19, 1994, and last amended on October 16, 2013).
ASA; 2013.
15. Smith FD. Management of exposure to waste anesthetic
gases. AORN J 2010; 91: 482-94.
16. Occupational
disease
among
operating
room
personnel:
a
national
study.
Report
of
an Ad Hoc Committee on the Effect of Trace
Anesthetics on the Health of Operating Room Personnel,
American Society of Anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 1974;
41: 321-40.
17. Alexander NG, Graham S. Gastroesophageal reflux and
aspiration of gastric contents in anesthesia practice. Anesth
& Analg 2001;93(2):494-513.
18. Department of Health and Social Security. Deaths due to
complications of anaesthesia. In: Report on confidential
enquirer into maternal deaths in England and Wales. London:
Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1957-1998.
19. Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use
of Pharmacologic Agents TO Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary
Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing
Elective Procedures. Anesthesiology 2017; 126:376-93.
20 . A S A .
S t anda r d s
f o r
Ba s i c
an e s t h e s i a
mon i t o r i ng : c ommi t t e e o f o r i g i n : s t anda r d s
and p r a c t i c e pa r ame t e r s ( app r o v e d b y t h e
A S A hou s e o f d e l e ga t e s on Oc t ob e r 21 , 1986 ,
l a s t ame nd e d on Oc t ob e r 20 , 2010 , and l a s t
a f f i rme d on Oc t ob e r 28 , 2015 ) . A S A ; 2015 .
El autor declara no tener conflictos de interés, en relación a este artículo.
REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
CONCLUSIONES
La cantidad de procedimientos que requieren asistencia
anestesiológica fuera de pabellón será cada día más amplia
y compleja. Los pacientes representan un grupo de riesgo
elevado de morbimortalidad. Los anestesiólogos enfrentan
el desafío de conocer el entorno y las características únicas
que involucran esta área de la anestesia y desarrollar las
competencias necesarias para brindar una atención segura.
Las instituciones deben velar por que se cumplan los
mismos estándares de calidad que reciben los pacientes del
ámbito de pabellón central. En esa dirección, el desarrollo
de protocolos y la capacitación continua del personal son
parte fundamental para disminuir la incidencia de compli-
caciones y la severidad de los daños.
[REV. MED. CLIN. CONDES - 2017; 28(5) 738-746]